<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Twitter Lists on Tweetdeck Changed My Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Strout</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Strout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>Scott - as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#039;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the things that&#039;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &quot;follow&quot; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#039;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With that said, there are some people I&#039;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#39;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.</p>
<p>One of the things that&#39;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &#8220;follow&#8221; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#39;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.</p>
<p>With that said, there are some people I&#39;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Strout</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Strout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Scott - as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#039;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the things that&#039;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &quot;follow&quot; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#039;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With that said, there are some people I&#039;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#39;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.</p>
<p>One of the things that&#39;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &#8220;follow&#8221; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#39;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.</p>
<p>With that said, there are some people I&#39;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Strout</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Strout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Scott - as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#039;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the things that&#039;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &quot;follow&quot; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#039;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With that said, there are some people I&#039;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; as you know, I always appreciate a differing viewpoint. God knows I&#39;ve certainly considered unfollowing many folks on Twitter in order to get down to the 200-300 people that I know best. But at the end of the day, I continue to have the value outweigh the burden.</p>
<p>One of the things that&#39;s interesting for me is the fact that while I like the idea of not needing to &#8220;follow&#8221; someone to see them on a list (which can then me viewed via Tweetdeck), there is a certain element of being able to DM folks i&#39;m connected with, especially since most are pretty respectful of not overusing that feature.</p>
<p>With that said, there are some people I&#39;ve not followed in the past based based on their lack of reciprocity but I may consider adding them back into the mix via a list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Good feedback, Scott. I&#039;m also micro-segmenting my Charlotte list, but keeping those lists private until I have them a little more fleshed out. I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll roll them out publicly soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;ll be interesting to see how the &quot;authoritative lits&quot; concept plays out. When lists were only on &lt;a href=&quot;http://Twitter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;, following someone else&#039;s list was a nuisance. Now that you can follow them in Tweetdeck, you may be right: Building a good list will earn you capital, just like finding and Tweeting good content does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good feedback, Scott. I&#39;m also micro-segmenting my Charlotte list, but keeping those lists private until I have them a little more fleshed out. I&#39;m sure I&#39;ll roll them out publicly soon.</p>
<p>It&#39;ll be interesting to see how the &#8220;authoritative lits&#8221; concept plays out. When lists were only on <a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow">Twitter.com</a>, following someone else&#39;s list was a nuisance. Now that you can follow them in Tweetdeck, you may be right: Building a good list will earn you capital, just like finding and Tweeting good content does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capitalfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>capitalfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>Rather than having a general list around a city I further segment within the geographic area by their topic. I would like to further segment local restaurants from local food bloggers but I&#039;ve maxed out the number of lists my account can have. My hope is that this limit is just arbitrary &amp; the list feature was designed to be scalable to a larger number of lists per user.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As clients implement the list feature &amp; since lists can be followed I think the next development will be authoritative list by topic. Not necessarily the largest lists (ie: every social media &#039;expert&#039;) but the most refined &amp; value adding. Those users that curate such lists will likely get a boost in &#039;whuffie&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than having a general list around a city I further segment within the geographic area by their topic. I would like to further segment local restaurants from local food bloggers but I&#39;ve maxed out the number of lists my account can have. My hope is that this limit is just arbitrary &#038; the list feature was designed to be scalable to a larger number of lists per user.</p>
<p>As clients implement the list feature &#038; since lists can be followed I think the next development will be authoritative list by topic. Not necessarily the largest lists (ie: every social media &#39;expert&#39;) but the most refined &#038; value adding. Those users that curate such lists will likely get a boost in &#39;whuffie&#39;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>Good feedback, Scott. I&#039;m also micro-segmenting my Charlotte list, but keeping those lists private until I have them a little more fleshed out. I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll roll them out publicly soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;ll be interesting to see how the &quot;authoritative lits&quot; concept plays out. When lists were only on &lt;a href=&quot;http://Twitter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;, following someone else&#039;s list was a nuisance. Now that you can follow them in Tweetdeck, you may be right: Building a good list will earn you capital, just like finding and Tweeting good content does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good feedback, Scott. I&#39;m also micro-segmenting my Charlotte list, but keeping those lists private until I have them a little more fleshed out. I&#39;m sure I&#39;ll roll them out publicly soon.</p>
<p>It&#39;ll be interesting to see how the &#8220;authoritative lits&#8221; concept plays out. When lists were only on <a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow">Twitter.com</a>, following someone else&#39;s list was a nuisance. Now that you can follow them in Tweetdeck, you may be right: Building a good list will earn you capital, just like finding and Tweeting good content does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capitalfellow</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>capitalfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Rather than having a general list around a city I further segment within the geographic area by their topic. I would like to further segment local restaurants from local food bloggers but I&#039;ve maxed out the number of lists my account can have. My hope is that this limit is just arbitrary &amp; the list feature was designed to be scalable to a larger number of lists per user.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As clients implement the list feature &amp; since lists can be followed I think the next development will be authoritative list by topic. Not necessarily the largest lists (ie: every social media &#039;expert&#039;) but the most refined &amp; value adding. Those users that curate such lists will likely get a boost in &#039;whuffie&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than having a general list around a city I further segment within the geographic area by their topic. I would like to further segment local restaurants from local food bloggers but I&#39;ve maxed out the number of lists my account can have. My hope is that this limit is just arbitrary &#038; the list feature was designed to be scalable to a larger number of lists per user.</p>
<p>As clients implement the list feature &#038; since lists can be followed I think the next development will be authoritative list by topic. Not necessarily the largest lists (ie: every social media &#39;expert&#39;) but the most refined &#038; value adding. Those users that curate such lists will likely get a boost in &#39;whuffie&#39;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eugmandel</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>eugmandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>Not only I think it&#039;s OK to unfollow people when sorting them into lists, I believe that the &quot;follow&quot; feature will become obsolete. I am re-organizing my usage of Twitter around lists alone: &lt;a href=&quot;http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/list-dont-follow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/lis...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only I think it&#39;s OK to unfollow people when sorting them into lists, I believe that the &#8220;follow&#8221; feature will become obsolete. I am re-organizing my usage of Twitter around lists alone: <a href="http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/list-dont-follow/" rel="nofollow">http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/lis&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Mandel</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaemerging.com/2009/12/06/how-twitter-lists-on-tweetdeck-changed-my-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=1566#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Not only I think it&#039;s OK to unfollow people when sorting them into lists, I believe that &quot;follow&quot; feature will become obsolete. I am re-organizing my use of Twitter arounf lists alone: &lt;a href=&quot;http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/list-dont-follow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/lis...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only I think it&#39;s OK to unfollow people when sorting them into lists, I believe that &#8220;follow&#8221; feature will become obsolete. I am re-organizing my use of Twitter arounf lists alone: <a href="http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/list-dont-follow/" rel="nofollow">http://shadesmodel.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/lis&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

